Springsteen-One More Thing…

Re-Springsteen Tickets

Bruce wouldn’t go to all-in pricing, he didn’t want to appear to be charging more than $100 for a ticket. So, you end up being mad at Ticketmaster, but those fees don’t go to the ticketing company, they’re promoter and building profit.

And let’s be clear, Bruce is no worse than so many of the major acts. But when you’re a superstar and you’re known for honesty, you’re a lightning rod, all these issues come down to you.

Bruce should take a stand. Bruce should be an agent for change.

But he’s afraid.

Of looking greedy.

But the end result is all that money goes to scalpers and fans have to buy tickets on the "black market".

All that money should go to Bruce, he deserves it. So, the whole arena should be paperless. Or tickets should be scaled.

Bruce could have been a leader here…

Re-Springsteen Tickets

From: Gary Dell’Abate
To: Bob Lefsetz
Subject: Springsteen

You should do a piece on the Springsteen tour.
I am on an e-mail chain with about 50 fans.
Not one of them could score a ticket through the web.
It looks like the scalpers won this round.

From: Bob Lefsetz
To: Gary Dell’Abate

This is very complicated.  Been on the phone with many of the players at length.

1. Paperless

They sold the Loge, the inner bowl around the floor, paperless where they could to prove to Cuomo that anti-paperless laws are ridiculous.

2. Springsteen insisted on selling the floor GA at a low price. He was told there would be chaos, but he didn’t want to raise the price.

Ultimately, this is Springsteen’s fault.

Springsteen shows either have to be totally paperless or scaled as to the true price.

But now Bruce gets to look like a man of the people whereas in reality he doesn’t care about the people.

_________________________

(Note: Did you hear Little Steven on Howard Stern today? So interesting when a fan interviews you, someone knowledgeable whom you trust.)

E-Mail Of The Day

Subject: DigSin/DRNK TXTNG

Bob,

I’d be interested to hear your take on this story about DigSin, Jay Frank’s new "label" model which launched this week.

Business Matters: Looking for a New Kind of Record Label? Here’s DigSin …

Not that I care about commercial radio anymore, but having read about his basic philosophy of what makes a radio hit (avg. intro 7 seconds, etc.), I was interested to hear what he was doing. I signed up for the mailing list, and then…yesterday, the first single came out and it sounds like all the other beat-driven shlock on Top 40 right now!

"Drunk Texting"–really original theme! 

Anyway, I get his model and understand why it might work for getting ad placements, but how does this fit into the model on the consumption side? I know the point isn’t to sell a bunch of downloads (why it’s a giveaway), but how can they claim that NNXT is a "very rare gem" when it sounds like everyone else? What am I missing in this strategy?

Complete song

Hierarchy Of Power

1. The Act

We’re returning to the classic rock era. Wherein the acts dictated to the labels as opposed to vice versa. But the story here now is there are no labels. Sure, there are a bunch of Top Forty acts that are essentially employees of the major labels, in everything but benefits (they’re independent contractors!), but that world now has a small fraction of the action and its share will decline.

The act is in control.

And this means…

A. They set the ticket prices.

B. They refuse to do all-in ticketing, they like you to hate Ticketmaster and its fees, but really, those are promoter profits.

C. If the price is high, it’s greed. If you can’t get a good ticket at a fair price, i.e. if the scalpers eat them all up, it’s because the act is afraid of pissing you off by approving high prices (and is probably scalping its own tickets to boot) and refuses to employ paperless.

Ticketing is not so different from politics. Incredible subterfuge. Hate the acts, not Ticketmaster or anyone below in the food chain. The act approves every deal.

2. The Manager

He’s the buffer between the act and everybody else. Most managers do the act’s bidding, but not all. Some managers tell the acts what to do, either through outright bullying or stating that without the manager they’re nothing. If your manager has other successful acts, be wary of whether he’s on your side.

Also, know that a manager works on commission. If the act does not get paid, the manager goes hungry. So these are competing interests. You might want to say no, but the manager might want to say yes. You only have one career, a manager can always get another act.

So choose your manager wisely. You have few options at the beginning, when you’re starting out. And if you leave you’re gonna owe the manager money, maybe forever. But that’s rock and roll.

3. The Agent

Especially important in the beginning. He gets you the gigs, it’s how you eat, it’s how you stay alive. Go with someone who understands your music and has acts like yours. Sure, they might represent the superstar, but can they get you gigs in a club? The dirty little secret is when you truly become a star you can cram down the commission. Not that anybody wants to talk about this. Yes, when the gigs are gonna sell out anyway, why pay 10%?

But unlike managers, you can leave agents at will. That’s not exactly true, but as a practical matter, it is. So agents are scared and you’ve got to establish trust, once you make it the power is in the hands of the act. USE IT!

Also know, like the manager, the agent only gets paid when you do. Do you really want to do that corporate endorsement or is the agent pushing it because he wants to get paid?

4. The Promoter

He’s got all the cash. If he says no, it’s no-go.

Ever since the SFX roll-up the game is different. There’s no loyalty, it’s only a matter of who pays most. And this has been accepted. So expecting an indie promoter to do you a favor and possibly lose money is a pipe dream when said indie knows you’re probably going to jump to Live Nation or AEG when you make it.

There are all kinds of deals. Q Prime acts tend to go for a percentage whereas other managers insist on a high guarantee. It’s important for a manager to keep up good relationships with indie promoters, you may benefit from this if your manager has other hit acts.

The promoter isn’t quite like a record company, stealing your money, then again he is. Since almost all of the ticket price goes to the act, the promoter’s got a ton of secret deals to make his profit, from venue kickbacks to advertising schemes to…

I will say you can’t trust a promoter, then again, the acts drove them to this.

5. The Label

Hell, most labels don’t even buy tickets to their acts’ gigs anymore. Yes, they buy them, they were never free. At face value. It’s expensive. And the label is broke. The label used to support you, put you on the road in clubs, build towards the future. But they no longer have that money and there’s no club circuit to speak of. By pulling back and refusing to enter the modern world, the label has marginalized itself. Furthermore, with the label paying you so little, the promoter has become the main source of revenue. You can speak of the label investing in you, but unless you’re a Top Forty act, if you can get signed, and the odds are marginal, they’re going to pay you very little. And unfortunately, if you do succeed, they’re going to screw you. The promoter screws you, but you still get most of the money. The label screws you, they get paid and they own the master. Huh? The label can speak of the risk, but at this point, the promoter takes a bigger risk, and his profit margin is low and only lasts for one night.

6. Ticketmaster

In the public eye, Ticketmaster is number one, it has all the power. Isn’t that a laugh. That’s how the acts like it, Ticketmaster takes all the heat for their greed. The acts like the fees, even though without them there’s no deal, there’s no profit. Ticketmaster keeps almost none of the fees, they kick them back to the promoter, the building and in some cases even the act!

Ticketmaster is a service company. If you think Ticketmaster dictates, you’re unsophisticated. Sure, an act has to deal with the built-in infrastructure of Ticketmaster, but don’t blame the ticketing company as opposed to the acts who preceded you, who helped build this system.

A. Prices should float to eliminate scalping. This is in the hands of the act, not Ticketmaster.

B. Paperless should be legal everywhere and employed when acts want to get tickets in the hands of true fans. But many stars don’t really care about the fans, that’s all lip-service. They care about money more.

C. Amex Pre-Sale
Profit to the act, plain and simple. Pre-sales are anti-fan. But somehow, the acts don’t take responsibility. And fans don’t want to believe the acts are guilty, because then who would they believe in, who would embody their hopes and dreams, politicians? Ha!

The acts have developed numerous ways to profit. You’ve got a problem with being unable to get a good ticket at a fair price? Blame no one but the act.

D. All-In Pricing

Acts don’t want it because it makes the final price higher, it makes them look greedy, or so they think. Instead, the fees are labeled Ticketmaster rip-offs. And you hate Ticketmaster instead of them. The government just required all-in ticketing for airlines. Are concerts next? They should be! At least Ticketmaster is putting the fees on the homepage now.

P.S. Change the name of the ticketing company and the game remains the same. There have to be fees, that’s how the promoter makes a profit.

CONCLUSION

Nobody in the above food chain wants the public to know the truth. But this lack of transparency is what has killed the major labels. And it’s a contributing factor to the decline in concert attendance. Sure, grosses may be good, but most people don’t go to the show very often, and this is unhealthy for music in general, especially when almost all the revenue is derived from the road.

Google provides analytics for free. We live in an era where data is rampant and available. But the music business is still built on smoke and mirrors.

But it won’t be forever. The public will demand some transparency and a younger, Net/data-savvy generation of executives will see it as necessary, it’s in their DNA.

Yet it is still a show, and shows have always been based on illusion.