Adele In Vegas

It’s always the stars that change the paradigm.

Credit John Meglen with starting the Vegas residency trend, with Celine Dion. And over the years more and more acts have played there for extended periods. And now we’ve got Adele.

The traveling is hell. Isn’t that what Dan Fogelberg said? The traveling kills you. The best part is the hour or so you’re on stage, the rest of the time…you’re unable to sleep, hanging with the same people every damn day and just trying to hang on. As for the rock star shenanigans, those are history now that everybody has a smartphone with a camera, never mind the #MeToo movement.

But let’s not forget Garth Brooks. Who plays until demand is exhausted. At low prices. This is the best way to kill scalpers ever invented. Why do more people not do this?

Because they want the money, they’d rather not work that hard, a lot of the old acts are pissed they’ve got to go on the road to earn their keep now that recording income is down.

But having the audience come to you?

It’s no longer the 1960s. Everybody’s been on a plane, flight is no longer classy, as evidenced by the air rage incidents of the last eighteen months.

And if you want to go to Vegas, not only are there numerous direct flights, but there are a zillion hotel rooms, and not all of them expensive, and Vegas needs to fill them. It’s a win win win. For the acts, the audience and the hotels.

There’s nothing cool about it, but it turns out cool is out of style. Do you want to go to Bonnaroo or JazzFest, do you want to camp in the mud or retire every night to your hotel room? Which is why the most successful new festivals are based in cities, not only are there a ton of customers in the surrounding area, you don’t have to camp and live together with everybody else. People don’t want to get together and live together, that faded with the sixties too.

As for Vegas… The truth is if acts are willing to commit to dates, tickets become available. Much of the mania of on sale dates is overblown. The flames of the hysteria are fanned by the absence of tickets, many having gone to scalpers, prices are driven up beyond demand. This is the Garth model. You could always get tickets for Celine. The showroom might be full at the end but you didn’t have to buy your tickets a year in advance to make sure you could see the show.

It’s business, it’s mature. You don’t go backwards. Concerts were nascent fifty and sixty years ago. There weren’t that many rooms, they weren’t all for music and sound was a challenge. Those problems have been fixed. In addition, with the roll-up in the nineties, the business has become professionalized. You’re not worried about Live Nation stiffing you, you’re willing to be paid by check instead of cash. So in what other ways can the business evolve beyond the old slog from town to town?

Credit country music, they figured it out years ago, with Branson. I’m not saying we need a whole new city, costs are too high and Vegas has the infrastructure. You’ve just got to train the public to go to Vegas to see their favorite acts.

And it’s well known that superstars don’t travel from city to city anyway, they park their butts in one metropolis and jet out to local gigs and then relocate to another hub. Maybe there can be residencies in these other hubs. You can play Vegas, Chicago, Atlanta and New York. Everybody is close enough to one of these cities. Forget the people who bitch, the truth is fans are willing to pay umpteen bucks to see their favorites, money is not the issue, why shouldn’t the burden be shouldered by the fans instead of the acts?

We haven’t had a revolution in touring in decades. Recorded music was disrupted, but not touring. But touring is ripe. The model can be changed to the benefit of everyone. Adele is going to do a better show if she’s not hassled with all that travel.

As for the coronavirus, did you read about Phish’s Halloween shows in Vegas?

“COVID from Vegas.’ Phish concerts leave a long trail of infections, fans say – Those who attended the Vermont-based band’s Las Vegas concerts over Halloween weekend say few wore masks and air was stagnant”: https://bit.ly/3EaixBv

Bring everybody to one location and they bring everything back all around the country.

Food for thought.

Get Back-Part Two

John Lennon is an asshole.

But Paul McCartney can be passive-aggressive.

So the shock here is the old cars. Watching the miniseries you believe you’re in the present, so why are the cars in the street so ancient? It’s cognitive dissonance. Paul may be complaining about the quality of 16mm film, but just like the Beatles’ recordings themselves, the images are pristine.

So in the second part George is back, the songs are coming together and the Beatle magic is evident. It’s the vocals, not only Paul’s pure voice but John’s light grade sandpapery one too.

And there are revelations… John plays the into guitar part of “I’ve Got a Feeling,” and solos too. And he can play the lap steel, it’s him on “For You Blue.” And Ringo can even play the piano, but he’s definitely a secondary character here. He plays the drums, you can’t have a band without them, but he’s not a major songwriter, a good part of the time he’s staring into the distance, that is when he’s not camping it up, a la “A Hard Day’s Night.”

As for George… There’s really no room for him. Oh, there’s plenty of room for his guitar, just not his input. He’s relatively quiet, thoughtful, and he speaks slowly, at times self-consciously, whereas Lennon just spouts whatever comes into his brain and McCartney oozes a subtle confidence. And most of the time the music creation is a conversation between John and Paul, this is how they’ve done it for years. But George was in the band from almost the beginning. As for Ringo, not only is the drummer, but he’s a latecomer, a la Jason Newsted in Metallica, and never fully accepted by the others, or should I say never feels completely comfortable with them.

So for decades we’ve seen the Beatles as the epitome of the sixties, the paragon, the tertiary acts have faded away and everybody else has become secondary. But that’s not the way it was. As a matter of fact, the way it was was music was everything for the younger generation. TV was a joke. As for films… The renaissance started in ’67, with “Bonnie and Clyde” and “The Graduate,” but it really didn’t gain full traction until ’69 and then the seventies. But in the interim, the youngsters had not only taken over music, but seemingly every other walk of life. This was the era when it became cool to be young, before this was not the case, your elders were respected and in control. Today, the boomers are in many cases out of it, just ask them for tech help, but they want to hold on to power and the younger generations believe that youth continues to rule, even though they have not demonstrated any reason why it should.

Bottom line, the Beatles were part of a scene, they weren’t the entire scene. Today the Beatles represent the sixties, during the era they were just part of the sixties.

And the band knew it.

When John talks about Fleetwood Mac… He’s not verbalizing from the perspective of a superior, but a contemporary, he digs what they do, he’s not quite envious, but he’s wowed.

There’s constant context. The Beatles are alone in a room, but they’re reading the newspaper, talking about what’s going on around them, yet still…

Self-referential.

We see the Beatle albums as discrete, each one individual, with a definite forward progression. But to the band itself, it’s all just part of their work, all accessible, not in the past but still in the present. In the first episode John goes off on my favorite Beatle song, “Every Little Thing.” In the second episode, he sings “I Feel Fine” and…these songs are part of the band’s history, part of their conversation, they’re their catalog, not to be discarded and forgotten, but referred to on a regular basis.

And they’re not above publicity. They’re reading what’s written about them constantly, despite remarking on its falsehood and asking Derek Taylor if they can sue. Then again, this was the sixties, WHEN THERE WAS SO MUCH ROCK PRESS! Funny how in the internet era there are more words, but fewer facts, and the stories don’t drive the culture, whereas back then they were everything.

So John Lennon acts like that kid in high school…who bats below his intelligence, but does not care, who believes he’s superior to the system and doesn’t need it anyway, he can survive without it. He’s constantly cracking jokes, throwing off asides, but almost always they have an edge to them, if you’re the recipient of his words you can feel bad. The band tolerates him, would anybody else?

Well the truth is when you’re a rock star you can get away with so much, but as you age this personality wears thin. Most people mellow out, the ones who don’t end up isolated. I wouldn’t say John can’t read the room so much as he doesn’t care what the room has to say or think. This makes him John Lennon, a singular rock hero, but it also demonstrates how if he were not a Beatle he’d have a hard time making it in life, getting along with everyday people.

As for Paul McCartney…when the going gets rough, he shuts up. You can tell he’s pissed, but he won’t tell you why, never mind proffer a solution. So the others keep talking while Paul stays quiet, waiting for a breaking point. Can you imagine being in a band with these guys?

They’ve all got issues. Which is why they’re musicians, artists. They’ve got a calling, they know they don’t fit in anywhere else, and they’re not big on compromise, because if it’s not right, it’s worthless.

But George does say the band always meanders to a conclusion, and that’s the best result. It’s the opposite of business, which has a distinct target and is regimented in its journey to the destination. The Beatles are messing around, they’ll get it done, but they’ll also have some laughs, and they’ll do a ton of experimentation, but when it’s all said and done it has to reach a certain bar, they insist upon it.

But the band is constantly playing material that ends up on other albums, your jaw drops when you hear McCartney sing “Her Majesty,” the throwaway coda at the end of “Abbey Road.” You thought it was written that way, an afterthought. Hm, no. It was a piece from the past that was jiggled into the second side.

And there’s “Oh! Darling” and so many other “Abbey Road” songs, as well as McCartney’s “Another Day” and “Teddy Boy,” the former of which is not going to come out on wax for years.

And Glyn Johns is the engineer, quiet, as most of them are, unwilling to weigh in for fear of losing their job, trying to get the sound right while the band is ready to go.

But the studio equipment! It looks like it’s out of a war room from the forties, maybe even the thirties! Now the truth is recording takes a giant leap forward at just about this time, with 16 track machines and Neve and other consoles, this is the last vestige of the old. But it’s cognitive dissonance once again, everything is so modern, where did they get this equipment, is this a joke?

And there’s not the constant overdubbing and comping of vocals which took hold in the seventies and are even worse in the era of Pro Tools. That’s why they’re doing it this way, as a band, to get back to where they once belonged.

So yes, the second episode moves forward, the songs come together, the tracks are laid down, they’re building to a conclusion.

Yet George Martin is there in his suit, on the floor reading the newspaper, about as engaged as Yoko, what is he doing, the vaunted producer?

So if you don’t want to invest eight hours, you can start with Part Two.

And a completist can watch it all, even over again, but that’s not the way the Beatles themselves were. They were just making another record, other than Paul, they were not taking it that seriously. As Paul tightens up, John actually gets looser and more involved. George enjoys playing every day. They’re a band again, the way it once was. As for being worried that the new record has to be as good as what came before, it has to top the chart, we hear nothing of that. That’s the modern paradigm. Which is inhibiting. Because if you feel the pressure of the audience/world, you can rarely deliver.

And the truth is in this episode the band is removed, in their own private world, they don’t even acknowledge the Scruffs outside the building.

And of course I must mention Billy Preston. This is how music works, behind the scenes it’s a culture, a family, if you don’t keep up relationships you get no opportunities. And Billy is invited to sit down at the piano as a casual thought, he’d just stopped by to say hi, this spontaneity, this refusal to weigh every decision heavily, is what results in the unexpectedly great, if you want to push forward you can’t rigidly adhere to the manual. As a matter of fact, so many famous rock sounds were created by musicians messing with the equipment.

And Billy is so skilled. He doesn’t have to go home and study, he’s paid his dues for years, on the road, in the studio, he can just sit down and play what is right, it’s amazing.

So the truth is George and Ringo evolved. After his solo albums hit a wall, George got the Traveling Wilburys together. Ringo became an actor, made music in different genres and ultimately went on the road. John? John recorded solo tunes, many worked out in these sessions, and then canceled his subscription to “Billboard” and retired, he wanted to have a life, see what he had missed. Being famous was not important. Then again, he had plenty of money. And then just when he came back, he was killed.

Paul?

He’s done the same thing over and over again expecting different results. Sure, the initial “McCartney,” done all by himself, was a revelation. And then Wings. But thereafter it became the McCartney show, the same thing over and over, he continued to hold the Beatles torch, but he was crippled by it. (Of course Paul eventually did the Fireman and recorded classical music, but he was never a leader in these areas, pushing the envelope.)

All the peripheral people… They were working with the Beatles, but if that’s all they had, they were heading for a big fall. Only the Beatles were the Beatles, only they could rest on their laurels. Glyn Johns and George Martin had to get other gigs. Ditto Michael Lindsay-Hogg. Even Derek Taylor. Time keeps running, you’ve got to keep moving, which can be hard to do after you’ve reached the pinnacle of success.

So the second episode moves faster, and is more interesting, but what you’ve got to remember is you may have more reverence for what you see on screen than the band itself. For them it was just another project, part of their life. It is not everything, it was just something. “Let It Be” was just another song. Ditto “Get Back.” Hell, they let Joe Cocker record “She Came in Through the Bathroom Window” before they did. The band was in motion, and only Paul seems to be linked to the past, the others are exploring, wanting to move forward, the Beatles is something they’re doing now, but it’s not the only thing they want to do in life. There’s so much more to life. But in the ensuing years, when music has been commoditized, when it panders, when it’s massaged to be a hit, it’s hard not to look back at the glory days evidenced here without being wowed. But that was then and this is now. And in many ways, just like in so many other walks of modern life, then was better than now.

The Beatles: Get Back-This Week On SiriusXM

Tune in today, November 30th, to Volume 106, 7 PM East, 4 PM West.

Phone #: 844-6-VOLUME, 844-686-5863 

Twitter: @lefsetz or @siriusxmvolume/#lefsetzlive

Hear the episode live on SiriusXM VOLUME: siriusxm.us/HearLefsetzLive  

If you miss the episode, you can hear it on demand on the SiriusXM app: siriusxm.us/LefsetzLive 

Beautiful World, Where Are You

https://amzn.to/3E8zvAr

This book did not get universally good reviews. And that’s significant, because its author, Sally Rooney, is the latest literary phenom.

Oh, you know her, even if you didn’t read her two previous books. She’s the one behind “Normal People,” on Hulu, which everybody was raving about last year. I tried, but once again the images did not square with the ones in my head, because so much of what Rooney writes is internal, not external, and visual entertainment is inherently external, which is another reason why some of the greatest books have never been made into movies or TV shows.

So, Rooney wrote about young life. Adolescence. College. Now what?

It’s hard to grow up, especially in the public eye, with so many expectations. And people believe they know who you are, they’re invested in your work, and reviewers, who usually are writers themselves, are out to get you, because they wish they’d gotten the acclaim you did.

So at first I’m reading “Beautiful World, Where Are You,” and I’m wondering what the blowback is all about, I’m really digging it, it’s great. But then…it becomes a bit repetitive, and the paragraphs are long, and I was getting sleepy, but then the second half of the book picked up and I finished it in one marathon jaunt Saturday afternoon.

So, what you’ve got here is two college friends, who profess nerdiness, who grew up without many friends and now have each other, even though in many ways they’re different.

Alice is a writer. She graduated, wrote a book and had instant success. She’s a millionaire, even though she’s barely thirty. Eileen is only making 20,000 a year at a literary magazine. So they’re living in two completely different economic strata, and that makes a difference. Although they’re both looking for love.

So Alice had her success and then had a nervous breakdown. She’s decamped for the west coast of Ireland, the other side of the country from Eileen’s Dublin, and she’s trying to start her life again and recover. And she goes on a Tinder date…

Yes, the book is very up to date. And it assumes you’re familiar with the experience. Rooney is not here to educate the reader, get up to speed on your own. As a matter of fact, the book is endless navel-gazing, which means many people will pick it up and be offended, talk about first world problems and move on. But although there’s nothing worse than having no money, no food and shelter, the truth is we’re all human beings and we’re all struggling, otherwise why would Christina Onassis commit suicide?

And most of the book is e-mail correspondence between Alice and Eileen, and it reads almost like a Greta Thunberg screed. The old fat cats, mostly men, may be in charge of the world, but it’s the youngsters who are gonna have to live in it. And they’re fiercely aware of global warming and the inane political situation, and Alice and Eileen write about this and debate how to live in modern society.

I mean it’s really frustrating. Do you read the news? Watching it is not the same. Bottom line, the world is insane, and America is one of the worst offenders. We now have a new Covid variant yet people are still refusing vaccination. The odds of dying are 11x higher if you’re unvaxxed, but if you get the vax you’ve surrendered, amongst your group your character is at stake. Never mind voting laws and… Nothing is gonna change, you can’t convince anybody to change their mind, you’ve just got to deal with the consequences. I mean I’m old and I live in California, but if you’re young and live elsewhere, it’s even more depressing,.

And the truth is what Alice and Eileen talk about…is what I talked about in college.

Today nobody wants to debate the issues, they’re too busy getting rich, or trying to. Subtleties are irrelevant, and if it doesn’t produce cash it’s off the table. So, you can be a college professor and analyze issues all day yet have no power in the real world, or you can be a businessman and focus on acquisition and lifestyle.

I used to think it was a west coast/east coast thing, but now that the nouveau riche financial sector dominates in NYC it’s all about money there too. And I want to have a deeper conversation and where can I turn? Certainly not the music business. But the musicians? They can debate this stuff all day long, they’re detached from society, they know the game is rigged, they’re inherently outsiders and they recognize this. But I’m not a musician, so it’s not my everyday life experience and…

I certainly don’t want to be part of the intelligentsia, self-righteous sans power.

So I’m left in between, with more questions than answers, like Alice and Eileen.

Alice is into a guy who is not into her. How do you behave? Retreat or lean in?

Eileen was dumped by a musician who is featured everywhere online and can’t get over the relationship even though all her friends put her ex down and say he wasn’t right for her, none of that that sways Eileen.

And then you’ve got the guy in love with Eileen who can’t get out of his own way. Everybody’s on their own life trip, and other than Alice, nobody is going anywhere fast, and Alice has got her status and money, her fame…but then she riffs how bogus fame is, that most of the people are doing it for the fame, and then people admire them and want to be them and how screwed up that is.

You can put your head down and ignore the world around you, but if you look up at all, you’re gonna have an existential crisis. Hell, we can’t even build anything in America anymore. That’s in today’s paper. All this money for infrastructure…all our projects go over budget and sometimes they’re not even completed!

And then you’ve got the Dems wanting to prop up local newspapers. Uh, no. Haven’t they seen twenty years of digital disruption? You don’t prop up the past, you look for a solution that will work tomorrow!

And then you’ve got the insane Afghanistan situation. The “Wall Street Journal” did a story today how the Taliban had infiltrated every aspect of the government and business, over years, so that’s why the coup was instant and to a great degree bloodless. But somehow it’s Biden’s fault, when he was living up to Trump’s timetable, intelligence officers were removed and… If you dig deep, thank god we got out of there, and Biden didn’t do such a bad job at all. But even Democrats think he was at fault, because they don’t read the facts, never mind them being in the right wing paper of record!

Feel powerless yet?

I certainly do.

Alice and Eileen are struggling to put one foot in front of the other. They’ve got the weight of the world on their shoulders and like me feel powerless to enact change. Should they just punt their futures as a result?

So I don’t recommend you read “Beautiful World, Where Are You.” Not unless my foregoing screed appeals to you. And most of my male readers only want to read nonfiction, when they’ll learn much more from this book and yes, the girls are whiners by today’s standards, but if you’re not whining, you’re an automaton.

So Sally Rooney is trying to grow up. And it’s a struggle. Obviously Alice is based on her own experience. I mean the best writing is from what you know.

And Rooney herself is not lovable. As for her stance on not allowing this book to be translated into Hebrew… If I hear one more person excoriating the Israelis and defending the Palestinians… Yes, they both have positives and negatives, but the Palestinians believe that Israel SHOULD NOT EXIST! How would you like living in a country like that? Put that in your book Sally Rooney.

But it’s not there. But so many issues are.

I found it stimulating.