There’s very little new information in this book, but that does not mean it’s not worth reading.

Unlike that new Stones book you see reviewed positively everywhere. The publisher asked me if I wanted a copy, I was intrigued from the very first page, but as I’m reading I’m wondering…HOW DOES HE KNOW THAT! Mick and Keith as late teenagers, on a train…

Then it occurs to me he got the information from previous writing, since the Glimmer Twins refused to talk to him.

WHO IS THIS GUY?

So I research and read he wrote a book about Led Zeppelin. How come I’ve never heard of it? Everybody knows “Hammer of the Gods,” people foam at the mouth for new Zeppelin material. But this author released his book to crickets and I’m supposed to read his compilation of previous Stones anecdotes?

Not me. Not for 700 pages, not while these guys are still alive and testifying.

Have you seen any of the Mick Jagger clips on TikTok? He’s promoting the new album and to pique our interest he’s testifying about all kinds of stuff we want to know more about. Like Nicky Hopkins. He finally reveals that Nicky composed and played the intro to “She’s a Rainbow,” talks about working with the piano player, his creative process, Mick says that prior to meeting Nicky he didn’t even know there was such a thing as an electric piano.

Now at this late date, there’s reams of writing on the Beatles, Dylan and the Stones. And there might be some people who’ve read all of it, but I haven’t. I’m not that much of a completist.

Which means there is info in this Dylan/Beatles book that I did not know. As for original material? There’s a short interview with Paul McCartney at the end, but this is a cut and paste job too. Almost an academic treatise. However, unlike the Stones book, there’s an underlying thesis, the ways in which Dylan and the Beatles interacted with each other and influenced each other.

And I’ll say the author makes his point, there were more points of connection than I thought. And he made me think…he posits that “You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away” was Dylan-influenced. He says that it was Dylan who got the boys to veer away from love songs and write about life.

And you’ll learn a bit about the Beatles. Most interesting was John’s peccadillos, especially with actress/singer Alma Cogan, who I’d never even heard of! He hated her, but when he became successful and met her… He was married and living with Cynthia, but he was stepping out.

And there’s an affair at a party, sex behind closed doors that initiates the Lost Weekend… That may be common knowledge, but I did not know it. This casts that period in a new light, for me anyway. Yoko was pissed about this dalliance! Then again, Lennon had a long history of making pronouncements and going against them vociferously just a few years later. Pledging fealty to Yoko, and then stepping out. Paying fealty to Jesus and then retracting it. And with it all laid out here, you can see how many potholes John hit in his solo career, makes you think he needed the other three. Also, the author gained credibility by saying the true solo debut, “John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band,” might have gotten good reviews, but it was a commercial stiff. Unlike “All Things Must Pass,” it was released after Thanksgiving, and never quite recovered from that late launch. People were overwhelmed with George’s work and Stephen Stills’s solo debut and the breakthrough of Elton John, a naked album sans single had a rough time in the marketplace.

As for George… In retrospect, he had the closest connection with Dylan. Stayed at his house in Bearsville, they were buddies, the groundwork for the Traveling Wilburys is laid out quite well here.

But really, you want to read this book to discover the derivation of so many of Dylan’s legendary songs. They may have been new to you, but they had history, “Subterranean Homesick Blues” was based on the Chuck Berry song, “Too Much Monkey Business.” Dylan just didn’t come up with this stuff out of thin air.

And all these guys had egos. Which were easily bruised, they were competing, it was not kumbaya.

And they were definitely paying attention to each other. And then there’s  Dylan’s “Fourth Time Around,” a direct lift of “Norwegian Wood” as payback for John ripping him off, or so Bob thought.

And they’re all young renegades, pushing for success, but when they get it they become thinkers and they’re questioning their paths, contemplating where they’re going and what effect it will have.

So you will certainly be informed of the connections and influences, but still some of the details, which are cobbled together from other writings, detailed in the notes at the back of the book, are fascinating. Dylan making his way to the Beatles’ hotel, dealing with the throngs.

And the 1966 tour…the Beatles didn’t go clean. Once again, the myth is that the Beatles did boffo at the b.o. until they retired from the stage, this was not true. There were ups and downs, but they soldiered on in the studio.

And Paul McCartney sends Dylan a note about an episode of his XM “Theme Time Radio” show…

These guys were paying attention to each other. And even Paul is anxious about leaning on Bob, knowing him, but how well exactly?

There are all these little scenes, that have obviously been portrayed previously, but I didn’t know the details. About Bob recovering from the motorcycle accident at a doctor friend’s house…

And the more time goes by, the more mortal these guys appear. Dylan wonders if his hold on the hit parade is over. Jeff Lynne modernizes George’s sound for the eighties.

So, once again, this book is really not breaking new ground except in the delineation of the author’s concept. Showing how the two acts crossed paths and influenced each other.

But I did not know that Bob Dylan joined a public tour group to go to John Lennon’s house. There are all these little tidbits that if you’re a Dylanologist, a reader of the Lewisohn books, you might know, but if you haven’t made that deep a dive, you’ll learn things.

It’s easy to die young and become and stay a legend. But how do you continue to live, in the public eye all the time, knowing that the odds of equaling your commercial peak are probably behind you? That is addressed too.

So if you have an interest in this topic, the comparing and contrasting of these two acts, you’ll like this book. Then again, there’s more reportage of chance meetings than pure analysis, then again, maybe i’s’ better that way, you can draw your own inferences and conclusions.

It’s not a hard read and you can put it down and pick it back up, but what makes it fun is that you know all these songs, they play in your head as you read…

And therefore the experience is fulfilling.

We got a new cornhole set. The last one was left in Monica’s backyard and the boards got warped and…

It was time for a new one, we got the itch after throwing the bags at Blake’s wedding.

Cornhole… That’s the name, kinda funny, don’t you think? Especially after Cornholio on “Beavis and Butt-head.” Let’s just say when I hear the name a sexual connotation comes to mind, but I think they originally filled the bags with corn… I should probably go to Wikipedia…

So we first played in Vail. And then Felice surprised me by buying a set. Kind of funny to be able to play on a whim, right at home. Kinda like having a built-in swimming pool, then again, those are no longer rare, like in the sixties, but…

You see cornhole boards in the strangest places. But frequently at bars. Cornhole and alcohol mix well.

So, let’s be clear, there are rules. Very easy, but so many people don’t know them. Bottom line, your points cancel out their points. So if you both get it through the hole, there are no points assigned to either of you. A hole is worth three points, getting it on the board is only one.

So, Felice purchased a new set and when it arrived…

I didn’t want to disappoint her, I didn’t want to be a naysayer after she made the effort, but this set was not regulation size, it was not 2′ by 4′, but about one-third smaller. And if we’re going to play…

So Amazon picked that one up, and Felice ordered a new set, a GoSports Tournament Edition. And the box was HEAVY!

It came on Saturday and I’ve been running ever since, but I promised Felice I’d break it out tonight. However, just now I was looking out the window from my office and I saw Felice in the backyard, getting some rays I believed, but no, she was setting up the boards!

So then I went down, ready to play.

Now you may have no idea what I’m talking about. But the bottom line is there are two angular boards, twenty seven feet apart, with a hole towards the top.

Now I’ve got to tell you, throwing it directly through the hole is akin to the crack of the bat, the satisfaction when you meet the pitch with a solid hit.

But that ain’t so easy to do.

For us anyway.

But if you go on YouTube…

They’re not even playing the same game! The way they throw the bag, kinda like a frisbee, they twirl it and…they get it in the hole regularly. It becomes a game of strategy, can you knock your opponent’s bag off the board, can you block the hole so they can’t slide it in?

Yes, throwing it straight through the hole is a thrill, but really, it’s about sliding the bag towards the hole.

But unlike our previous set, this is a PROFESSIONAL set. Which means the wood is shiny, and more slippery and…

I’m reading the instructions and it says the bags have two sides, shiny and smooth and woven and rough.

Now to be honest, neither of us can throw so we’re sure which side lands first, but you think about it, and…

It was damn hard to keep the bags on the board!

But it got even worse, you could throw a bag, have it land and stay on the board, and then slowly it would slide off. I was convinced that this was the effect of the shiny side, but then Felice figured out it was the rough side that slid, which was counterintuitive. So, you can have a point, and the bag can slide right off and you’re left with nothing. You can still get a point if a bag is only partially on the board, but it has to be supported by the board, not the ground.

So you play like ping-pong, you’ve got to win by two. Then again, it can be tied and one 3-bagger can end the game. Which just happened with us.

God, we were rusty. At times we weren’t even hitting the board. But then we got a bit in the groove. Felice was ahead six zip, but then I slowly came back, until it was six six, and then I got ahead seven six. Ultimately we evened it up at eight eight, but then Felice threw one right through the hole and beat me, eleven eight.

I can handle it.

But you’d be surprised how competitive people get. Doesn’t take long before they want to win, before they start berating themselves for bad shots.

So we only played one game, after all, it took a while, we weren’t getting many points, and every time we did, it seemed the other person canceled them out. But then we stopped, got to work our bodies into condition. You twist and use muscles and you don’t want to overdo it.

Now in truth I need to go back to YouTube and study up, get some tips. I don’t want to take it too seriously, I’m never going to go pro, but I could improve…

And now we’ve got our summer entertainment!

I read this article about Tide:

“Tide Already Dominates Detergent. Why Is P&G Pushing a New Version? – The company controls about 60% of the market, but won’t stop reinventing. Now, it’s betting the future of laundry is ’tiles.'”

https://www.wsj.com/business/tide-laundry-soap-procter-gamble-2938e8b6

https://apple.news/A43i010C7TpOk1pHMBgFdnQ

Tide was introduced in 1946, before that Procter & Gamble purveyed Duz and Oxydol, which were juggernauts. Bottom line, the introduction of Tide would kill those two products, and it did.

And now, the standard of laundry detergent is those Tide pods. You know, the little two-toned balls that you have to make sure kids don’t swallow.

But now Tide is introducing these Triscuit-type tiles? They look like a step backward, but the truth is that they couldn’t push Tide forward technologically with the pod product. Ergo, the tiles.

This whole article is about Procter & Gamble disrupting itself. It’s Clayton Christensen’s “Innovator’s Dilemma” in action. But it’s not a young tech company, but an old company selling soap…

And this made me think about record labels.

Now the labels were disrupted by Napster back at the turn of the century. People predicted their demise, but this never happened, primarily because of their catalogs. And now, more than ever, catalog music, old music, is keeping these now-consolidated companies alive. When it comes to new music, there’s no innovation whatsoever.

Now I’ve got to give the majors credit for buying the indie distribution companies, distribution is king, and if you own the pipeline…never mind getting the data, you can amplify that which gains traction. But as far as building it from scratch?

The major labels are categorically unable to do that. They OWNED new music production, but now they can’t break an act and the indies keep gaining market share.

So what do the major labels do?

Cut staff and release fewer and fewer records in ever more dwindling categories. Sure they’ll tell you they work DSPs, do their best on social media, but they’ve still got big radio departments, to a great degree it’s the same as it ever was. They’re resting on their laurels when they need to disrupt themselves in order to maintain their power. And they’re not, which is why they’re losing power.

Today lasting acts are built on the road. Live Nation is in the artist development business more than any major label.

But the major labels could change course.

Instead of waiting for acts to break themselves, to make noise on social media, gain a following, major labels could search out great talent. They’re not even in this business today, it’s all commerce all the time. It’s kind of like the movie studios who are focused on superheroes and horror, they’re not serving up anything for so much of the public, especially oldsters.

But records are so much cheaper to make.

So labels should be searching out talent that is…TALENTED! New and different. And commit to these acts for a period of time and product, it used to be five albums over five years. So that the act can evolve and people can gravitate to them.

You don’t hear a single?

Forget the single. The single has never had less of the market. The focus should be on careers, acts testing limits, innovative musicians who have something to say.

No one is absolutely sure what will catch on with the audience, which is why you have to take risk. But today the majors are risk averse. They’re just protecting their market share doing it the way they always have, the opposite of Procter & Gamble and Tide.

And P&G has so many people working in R&D, after all this represents the future. Meanwhile, if it doesn’t contribute to the bottom line immediately, the major label has excised it.

The major labels need more A&R people. Not paid that much, who penetrate scenes, go on the hunt for new trends, who get their finger on the pulse, who sign thinking artists who will push the envelope.

Look at it like Netflix. It became a behemoth by putting out a plethora of product. Netflix puts out a comedy special a week. HBO? Every once in a while. And now Netflix owns comedy.

And not all of Netflix’s standup specials are great, but when you give someone a chance, you never know what they’ll deliver.

A great artist is rarely a great business person. They need help. A manager and a label. But the deal must be different, financially fair. All upside.

I’d pay attention if a major label nurtured an act that was outside the Spotify Top 50 musically and promoted it. We are looking for gatekeepers! Now we’ve got a vast online audience overwhelmed with musicians seeking attention when most of them don’t deserve it. Please, please, please sign something worth my attention, worth my time, and point me to it.

I don’t need another me-too rapper, or built by committee pop star. Hell, stop swinging for the fences. Almost everything worth paying attention to grows slowly and evolves, and the audience wants to go along for the ride, see the changes.

This is what the Beatles did.

But in the sixties record labels didn’t expect every album to be gigantic, they recorded them on a budget and tried to hook the audience up with the music.

And we were constantly surprised. Stuff that seemed completely uncommercial broke wide.

Those days need to return.

But it will only happen if the majors disrupt themselves, change their systems. Fire the dead wood. Flatten the pay scale. Make everybody think they’re in it together. Get people looking for new music instead of just promoting priorities.

A few innovative acts lift all boats.

But the majors are not doing this, they’re promoting the same dreck and the public knows it. Diva schmiva. Deliver someone who has something to say who makes the audience think. Someone who makes music that confounds people. Something that makes people talk about the music itself as opposed to ticket and merch sales.

We need to bring excitement back to music.

And to do this, we need a total reset regarding discovery and promotion.

But everybody at the labels is baked into the old ways. Sans their catalogs, the majors would be wiped out by innovative new music enterprises. They could disrupt themselves, but they’re not even trying to do this. They’re focused on financial engineering, when they should be focused on emotions, feelings… Just because some nitwits keep buying crap that doesn’t make it good.

Don’t focus on riches and fame, focus on music. Don’t hype, deliver.

Or maybe some hedge fund will come along and realign the whole company. Yes, hedge funds have a bad rep, but the truth is they evaluate a company, cut fat and create something shiny and new that is so efficient and hot that they flip it.

Meanwhile, major label stocks go down.

Think about it.

My oldest daughter just turned 41.  She was conceived in a Chevy van with the mural from the Relayer album on the side.  I still can’t get her to enjoy Yes.

Al Jones

Covington, LA

________________________________

Glad you got to see Jon with the Band Geeks. Check out “perpetual change” which is their live album.  It’s remarkable and the best interpretation of Yes music since the early 70’s.   Gates of Delerium is unreal….wish they’d play that again live.

Lee Abrams

________________________________

LOVE this!
I am a diehard YES fan going back over 50 years.
Last weekend we had my high school 50th reunion, class of 76.

I looked at the yearbook and my senior quote was “I’ve seen all good people turn their heads each day so satisfied, I’m on my way”

Steve Gerardi

________________________________

Over the years, Yes seemed to slow down the pace of the music.

The Band Geeks play the music with energy!

Great decision by Jon Anderson.

Gary Berlak

________________________________

I have not had the pleasure of seeing Jon with the Band Geeks, but a few years ago I caught him in concert with kids from the Paul Green School of Rock. It was magical watching these young teens gathered around him playing classic Yes songs. They sounded really great, and through it all, Jon had this look on his face of unbridled joy. When they finished playing “Heart of the Sunrise” I looked at my friend next to me and he was tearing  up.

I’ve seen many incarnations of Yes over the years, but Jon and these kids was one of the best.

Regards,
Rod Henry

________________________________

YES! Jon’s band is MUCH better than the Steve Howe tribute that is currently on the road

Larry Shockley

________________________________

Well put, Bob.

The work that Jon has been doing with The Band Geeks only goes to show that Yes needs Jon Anderson more than Jon Anderson needs Yes.

While it’s nice to see Yes making new albums without Anderson, they lack his unique qualities that made Yes music sound like ‘Yes’. Even during the Trevor Rabin era, Jon’s presence kept that incarantion of the band valid.

The irony is the new Yes line-up continues to record new songs but then go and tour with sets that are almost entirely full of classic songs that Jon Anderson was a significant part of creating.

I doubt we’ll see Anderson’s return to Yes, given Steve Howe is cleaarly happy with calling all the shots with Chris and Jon out of the way.

In the meantime, Jon is still making great music and The Band Geeks are a perfect fit for him to continue to make new music and deliver the the kind of performances that the current Yes is lacking.

Lee Elliott

________________________________

So glad you went to see them.  Yes was always music that had to be experienced and not explained.  The music is grand and majestic, and I believe that, as a group, they were one of the “classical” composers of our time.  Jon was the center of it, so even though he lost the name due to political and business issues, he is still the soul of Yes music.  His voice is still distinct and angelic, and his beautiful abstract lyrics evoke imagery and spiritual messages that transcend rock and roll.  The Band Geeks have rejuvenated him and at this point are stronger players than what passes for the “official” branded Yes band.  Although they do not have the presence and  flair of Chris Squire or Rick Wakeman (who does?), they bring the energy and musicianship of the originals.

I’m looking forward to seeing them as they make their way up the coast this week.  I always go as often as I can.  As with all from that era, you never know when it will be the last.

Best regards,

Andrew Mehlman

________________________________

Yes changed the way I thought about music and what a “rock” band was capable of.

I was 14 when Close to the Edge came out and, as has been noted, that’s the key age to really fall in love with music that seems to be directly transmitted to you, you are like a sponge letting it seep into you, your persona, your dreams, your emotions.

They remain my favourite band all these years later, I suppose they are my “Beatles”, comparing the impact that the fab 4 had on people just a bit older.

The fact that Anderson still goes for (and hits!) those high notes is remarkable – I saw this tour in Troy NY last month. The Band Geeks can play that stuff in the correct keys and at the correct tempos, something the Steve Howe version struggles with.

Glad you felt it too Bob, I am not ashamed to say that “Awaken” moved me to tears, not many songs can do that.

Mark Hudson

________________________________

Love Yes. I was there for the world premiere of ClTTE in London, Sept 1972. Many years later I was at Armoury Studios in Vancouver working with Yes on The Ladder, hearing the story of Yes almost falling apart during that performance of CTTE. It was the first time they made it through the whole song!

Jon is a wonder. Thx for remembering..

Cheers,
Drew Arnott

________________________________

Prog is on the rise, you must know that. The kids are getting involved and my guess is that the young musicians want more.

I went to a concert by The Musical Box, the outstanding Genesis tribute band ( endorsed by the original members) and it was encouraging how many youngsters under 30, sh*t, under 20 were at the show.

Fritz Doddy

________________________________

Completely agree. Yes morphed multiple times but Jon was almost always the constant.  This was a great show. We may be old AKs but we know good music (and today’s drivel sure isn’t)  regards-Doc Blues

Mark Gresser

________________________________

This reminded me that during the 70’s heyday, it was not unusual for local bands to play these songs. During my freshman week in Bloomington, I saw a band play a Yes medley followed by a Jethro Tull medley. As a fan of both, I knew the tracks inside out and these guys were good. It blew my mind. I also saw a local Nashville band called Sweetwater, including Adrian Belew, play a faithful but high energy version of “Getting Better”. Amazing! Hearing great young musicians play this music live with live energy was thrilling.

Robert Bond

________________________________

In about 1976 or 77, I taped a live Yes concert off the radio (on cassette) . For an encore they did “Every Little Thing” and it was fantastic. Listened to that tape many times.

Perry Resnick

________________________________

It was one of THE best concerts period. Doesn’t matter who or what music is liked past or present.  The point he makes about not bs dancers or light show or madonna/gaga set changes, it was pure pure pure music and the best of it.  The Band Geeks IS YES, not Howe’s cover band.  Jon hasn’t changed since I first saw him in their first show in LA 1971!  He’s no less an angel if one believes and even if one doesn’t like most of us.

The crowd was NOT all grey haired oldsters, no idea why he said that.  Even my kids and grands know YES.  Rick and Trevor are always missed but we got their soul and even more…rock and amazing solos were jaw dropping.  And his mention of a few new songs??? OMG, TRUE is a magnificent album and everyone knew those songs as well.  He waved a peace symbol rainbow flag, because we did see All Good People…and it’s PRIDE month!!!!!!!

Anyway, other than the YES show in the Round at the Forum, this was at least equal in talent, music, fans, love,  The FOH sucked which is weird for this theater but sound guys….  yet, other than a few mishaps by them, sound at Kavli is great.

Jon is a Treasure in the Music World and we were blessed to once again be with him.

Robin Rose

________________________________

I am so glad you got to see this show. It’s been touring for a couple of years now and I’ve been blown away. I couldn’t put my finger on it, how it was different from other old acts out on tour, and you’ve done a great job describing how and why it is. I am/was a casual Yes fan. Although I was all in during the Trevor Rabin era. But this collaboration with the Band Geeks really show what a genius Anderson is. He really does have the pipes. It’s crazy. And the backstory of how they got together is just as good as the Journey/Arnel story.

Much credit should be given to bassist Richie Castellano who has been in Blue Oyster Cult for 20 years or something like that.

The album of new songs that was released last year has some great stuff on it too.

Happy you discovered the secret of Anderson/BandGeeks.

Quint Randle

________________________________

Howe and Squire made a grave error removing Anderson from the band. I’m sure Davison comes much cheaper, so there’s less money to split up.

But this is not a Journey situation. We all know that Anderson can still bring it In fact, these days, Pineda is having trouble doing so at age 58. So when you see “Yes” these days, every syllable of the singing is wrong, and everyone in the band is old and slow.

Not these guys.

So dumb. Someone needs to tell Howe that:

Time is running out. We want to hear that guitar and Anderson’s voice while we still can.

There are two numbers: 1) the percentage he gets – obviously higher these days without a Squire, White, Wakeman, or an OG Anderson to split it up with and, 2) the total revenue from the shows that his percentage is multiplied against.

Let’s say he’s generous and gives the rest of the current “Yes” 40%. Great. He’s making 60% of the revenue instead of 30%, of two-three times as much, while disappointing and/or pissing off fans and ruining his legacy as a resullt. I have to think that they’d be playing, at a minimum, 3,000-seaters instead of these tiny theaters they play in now.

You nailed it – we go to Jon and the Geeks to see a real Yes, played energetically with the vocal vibrations that nail the lyrics and the tunes. Basically, the guy who still has his pipes is playing with younger people who nail all the instrumental parts with all of their chops. That the greed of Howe allows him to think anyone is fooled by plastering the logo on the current line-up is pretty galling, as much as we love him too.

BTW, that’s a great observation – there are no bathroom songs on a Yes setlist. There has never have any.

Gary Lang

________________________________

The show was indeed tremendous, incredible, excellent, one of the best concerts I’ve seen in many a moon and I love going to concerts!

I’ve seen a lot of flack on social about how terrible the sound was- the sound to my ear was incredible and excellent, some of the best I’ve heard in a concert venue stetting- although the mixer did miss MANY sound cues including the first few words out of Jon Anderson’s voice. Near the end of Starship Trooper the guitarist was nearly inaudible for a good chunk of the song, not even close to the level it should have been so there were some odd and puzzling choices if that’s what you could call them… but what I could hear for most of the show was excellently balanced.

Cheers,

Michael Stern C.A.S.
New Toys / New Gear Editor
Music Connection Magazine

________________________________

When Jon couldn’t tour due to health reasons, YEs went out and found a singer from a tribute band (then did it again a few years later).  Jon just got a whole tribute band to back him up, which seems much more authentic, given that he wrote and sang most of the songs to start with.

And thanks for the Gentle Giant mention!

Sky Wallace

________________________________

I’ve seen every version of Yes since 1979. It’s the music, the people and the live show. The very best players, playing complex music you remember.

Yea I’ve been a fan boy for years. And listen to the catalog all the way thru at least once a year.
Not tired of it yet

Bob Maggio

________________________________

I saw Jon Anderson and the Band Geeks in April and—yes—they aren’t Yes—but they are BETTER than the last version of the “real” Yes that I saw play (sans Anderson) a few years ago.  That official Yes was sloppy and disappointing. So hearing Jon? With this crack pot band? Way better.

And Bob— these guys deserve to have their names mentioned: Richie Castellano, Andy Ascolese, Andy Graziano, Rob Schmoll, Christopher Clark, and Robert Kipp. These guys are serious players; and yet another testament to the “new” model of music success, where people play their hearts out on YouTube and then find their way to playing with big name artists….Long live prog!

thanks,

Mark Feldman

Boston

________________________________

Both Jon Anderson and Rush prove it every night they’re onstage. I’d venture to say this kind of music *is* actually timeless. Never made for the charts, just for the listeners. Just as vibrant to my ears today as when I bought the original LPs (and CDs — and now LPs again).

Why is their respective reach expanding? Rush guitarist Alex Lifeson said it to me during one of our interviews back in the early ’90s, to the effect of: “Listeners like you championed us and started writing about us once you turned professional.” We didn’t care what the rock-critic cognoscenti said about bands like Rush, Yes, King Crimson, Nektar, Camel, Caravan, etc… we *loved* that music, and it was — and still is — damn good. And now, a generation-plus after mine are finally able to discover this special, mystical kind of music alchemy firsthand.

To springboard from something you semi-rhetorically wondered, I do feel the music made by artists like Jon Anderson and Rush is *our* classical music: Intricate, layered, involving, challenging, and constantly revealing.

I look forward to seeing Rush in August, and I’ll see them as many times as I’m able. Ditto Jon Anderson — and Nektar too, for that matter.

Now get out there and rock… and roll the bones.

Mike Mettler

Analog Planet

________________________________

You’re so right about losing interest in a band when they lose a member who may have not been a main cog of the band…When Neal and Jon (or as I call them The Dimmer Twins) fired Ross and Smitty from Journey… I was out… way out… to the point of not even listening anymore…that’s just the way I’m wired…

 

Was always a casual fan of YES but I’m pretty sure I’d love this show… especially knowing Jon Anderson still has the pipes!

Tom Clark

________________________________

I also think a lot about the same things you think about Bob.

Why was it so different back then? Why did the music mean so much?

So I believe all of the following.

The music touched my soul. It was earth shaking when I heard something amazing.

I remember exactly where I was the first time I heard Dr. Wu from Steely Dan. It hit so hard it is never forgotten.

Same for Beatles, Procol Harum, The Band, and so many others.

It wasn’t for the money. It was for the creation…for the love of it all.

It had never been done before. New ground, new sounds were being created and boundaries were constantly being broken.

There was integrity. There was hope. There was love. Music brought us together.

It’s much harder now.  Music isn’t even taught in many schools any more. We are totally distracted.

It’s difficult to find the great music. It’s still out there….but I am tired now. It’s a real effort to find anything and get past the cesspool

of advertising that we have devolved into.

But I still look and listen, and often the older bands and songs resonate in a way that was unique to the times in which it was written.

Leigh Goldstein

________________________________

From many:

Rick Wakeman was NOT on The Yes Album

He joined at Fragile…

(Of course)

________________________________

The 805 will surprise ya!

Michelle Jacobs