God Don’t Never Change

GIVE YOUR MUSIC AWAY!

Please, if you’re an indie artist, if you’re not signed to a major label (which probably won’t allow you to do this), PLEASE put up downloadable MP3s on your homepage.  Put all your tracks on MySpace.  It’s almost impossible to be recognized, to get any attention in this overloaded world, and you want people to pay first, in order to check your music out?

If someone’s a fan, they’ll give you ALL their money!  They’ll buy the CD to display in their home, even if they never fire up their CD player anymore.  They’ll buy merch to support you, to show how much they love you.  And they’ll buy music for their friends, trying to share the joy with them!  It all starts with the music, but you’ve got to make the music AVAILABLE!

I got this CD from Ashley Cleveland.  Even though her husband has the last name Greenberg, Ashley is a Christian, and after losing her deal with Atlantic, she started making religious music.  Not that religious music sounds like it used to, but I’m not big on being preached to.  And do I really want to play an album entitled "God Don’t Never Change"?  I’m more interested in questioning whether he exists, not whether fundamentalists are refusing to reinterpret his word, as passed down by a flock who never saw his human manifestation walk across water.

If I didn’t love so much of Ashley’s work, I wouldn’t have played this album.  But when I did, I was stunned!  This was ROCK AND ROLL!

I don’t mean let’s get fucked up and burn down the house music, I’m just speaking of music that speaks to your genitalia as well as your heart. Rock and roll’s got soul.  The instrumentation takes you away from the world you’re presently inhabiting, whisking you to a virtual bar, where you’re on your way up, where your body can’t help but MOVE!

Kenny Greenberg is an ace guitarist.  And his fingerprints are all over this album.  Not only as a fleet-fingered ace, but as producer.  The recording may be digital, but it’s got a warmth, it BREATHES!

One of my favorite records EVER is Ry Cooder’s "Into The Purple Valley".  It’s a PROJECT record.  A veritable CONCEPT!  A rerecording of Dust Bowl era tunes which fit not at all into the early seventies landscape, but end up sounding timeless today.  "God Don’t Never Change" is a similar record.  Ashley and Kenny heard a public radio broadcast about old black gospel music and said to themselves, LET’S MAKE AN ALBUM OF THIS!

Bad concept if you’re an executive, brilliant if you’re a musician.

You see this idea doesn’t work on paper, you can’t even describe it, you’ve got to HEAR IT!  A musician can hear the finished product before he’s even laid down a lick.  That’s the TALENT!  And what Ashley and Kenny envisioned ROCKS!

Is it made for Top Forty?

Is it made for Country?

Is it even made for CHRISTIAN?

I don’t see ANY format as being appropriate.  "God Don’t Never Change" exists in its own rarified air.  It’s something that’s sold by word of mouth.  But Ashley and Kenny are stopping it dead in its tracks, by not allowing people to HEAR IT!

You can only hear samples on Ashley’s site.  And what about that report today that said thirty second samples don’t close people?

But forget the big corporations, what about STRUGGLING musicians?

If something is good, if people like it, they’ll tell everybody they know about it.  Because there are very few good things out there!

"God Don’t Never Change" is good.  Play the opening track, "My God Called Me This Morning".  But first play "Samson and Delilah".  Which is like a Christian version of Rod Stewart’s "Cut Across Shorty", but with more RESONANCE, more AIR!

The future isn’t radio, it’s not television.  It’s one to one.  It’s from me to you, kind of like that "BusinessWeek" story about Apple and Google allowing customers to trade apps. 

The key is to build the infrastructure, to get the product in people’s hands.  Focusing on money first ALWAYS HOLDS YOU BACK!

Desperation

"Newsweek" attacked Oprah.

Is there a need for newsweeklies anymore?

The staff at "Newsweek" didn’t think so, so they decided to remake the magazine in the mold of the "Economist".  They took a week off and then introduced a book full of analysis of deep issues by experts.  And a little bit of fluff at the end…  It’s almost impossible to completely deny your roots, just like a child carrying along his teddy bear on vacation, "Newsweek" still includes some pop culture pap at the end, kind of a good night kiss, or at least a glass of warm milk, for readers  But the magazine flatly denied they would do any more celebrity journalism, they were no longer going to be part of the problem, but part of the solution!

So why the fuck was Oprah on the cover?

I pulled my issue from the mailbox and winced.  This soon into the new paradigm and "Newsweek" has already blinked?  Wimped out and caved, believing there are immutable laws of newsstand sales, of magazine viability?

"Crazy Talk: Oprah, Wacky Cures & You".

Oh, this’ll be interesting.  Like I need more b.s. on bullshit cures.  That’s how you feel powerful in today’s society.  You question science, you defy the experts, who’ve gone to school for umpteen years to achieve enough background to run experiments and come to conclusions. Corporations are not to be trusted.  There is no truth.  Oh really?

Is the Earth round?

I’d say we can state that definitively, ever since satellites took pictures from up in space.  So many questions have been answered by modern science/technology.  But not enough for the downtrodden.  Those afflicted with disease, those newly broke, suddenly they have the answers to the universe, we must pay attention to them!

If one more New Age asshole tells me how to beat the common cold with zinc or some other formulation sold at the health food store, I’m gonna explode.  DOESN’T WORK!  Studies have proven this again and again.  Just like Glucosamine won’t return your knees to teenage health.  But people keep drinking the stuff, they want to believe!

And belief is everything these days.

Believe you’re going to become rich.

Believe you can find Mr. Right by making yourself look good on a dating site, instead of remaking your personality that’s turned off men for decades.

Believe you can cure your own CANCER!  The power of positive thinking, there’s nothing like it.  HUH?

So I’m turning the pages of "Newsweek", trying to navigate the tiny type now employed that works if you’re ten, even though the magazine appeals to older folk, and I eventually stumble upon this Oprah article.  And find out I’m all wrong.  They’re attacking the queen of all media!

Can you attack Oprah?

Conventional wisdom says no!  Oprah is god, she can sell anything.  Millions of women are devoted to her, will follow her anywhere.  You must pledge fealty to Oprah, the same way you smile and shake hands with that reprehensible politician, or that guy you do business with.  Truth happens behind closed doors, if at all.  We live in a smiling, beatific nation, where everybody loves everybody.  Oh, other than the snits between stars.  Who snubbed who, who head-butt who.  We want to know if Brad Pitt is really pissed at Angelina, but we never question the movie stars’ expertise on world issues.  They’re famous, they know!

Like Suzanne Somers.  She was on "Three’s Company"!  And now she’s got the key to longevity, she’s found the fountain of youth!  She’s on "Oprah" telling us how she did it.  And Oprah’s endorsing her!

This article is stunning.  It unmasks all the quasi-science that Oprah is purveying on her show, to the detriment of her viewers.  Jenny McCarthy saying vaccines cause autism, even though studies have definitively proven otherwise.  Do corporations truly want Jenny’s kid to be fucked up?  Are they truly squashing him under their wheels in the name of profits?  Is the government truly in bed with corporations to the point where all studies are flawed, and a former Playboy playmate has the answers?

No.

And all this is interesting.  But what’s truly fascinating is "Newsweek" took a risk.  They broke a taboo.  They attacked Oprah.  Because they were DESPERATE!

I won’t walk you through "Newsweek"’s plan for survival, but the magazine’s long term health is truly in question.  So why hold back now?  Why play by the rules now?  If GM can go bankrupt, anything can happen.  Take a chance!

That’s what’s going on in today’s society.  Corporations have stopped worrying about blowback and have started doing what’s right, for their survival.  At least some have.  Those that haven’t, like the aforementioned GM, end up losing their CEO and getting a right-minded replacement.

Put it this way.  Is Doug Morris so busy trying to protect the old ways that he’s losing his complete business?

I’d say YES!

Sure, the RIAA, driven by Universal, took action, suing file traders.  One can see that as a desperate move.  It’s just that the goal was wrong.  If you’re desperate, if you’re rewriting the playbook, you must contemplate a new reality, one in which your company is remade for the future!

The "New York Times" said that the rights holders are loosening up terms for online startups (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/technology/start-ups/28music.html).  That’s a good beginning.  But what about one step clearing!  You want to start an online music company?  Just follow these rules and you’re in business!

When are the promoters going to stand up to the acts?  And tell them that they must make a profit.  And that ticket fees must be included, without commission, in the overall price?  Because the customer is pissed, to the detriment of both.

If you’re worrying about politics, if you’re worried about the after effects of your desperate move, your Hail Mary pass, your effort to save your enterprise, you’re missing the point.  It’s open season.  We’re experiencing a restructuring of media heretofore unseen.  Who will rule in the future?  Well, if Universal doesn’t get its act together, every new act might end up with Topspin!

Your only limit should be breaking the law.

Other than that, go ahead.  Piss off Jimmy Iovine.  Say what you want about Eminem.  In an era where "Radio & Records" goes out of business, are there truly any sacred cows left?

Olive Kitteridge

It was hot in Beverly Hills this afternoon.

I’d gone to the Polo Lounge to have lunch with Ellis Rich, Chairman of the PRS.  As we discussed the minimum YouTube royalty, two gentlemen got up from their table and started walking towards us.  I immediately recognized Terry Semel, late of Yahoo, formerly of Warner Brothers, but it took me a moment to realize he was with Les Moonves.  I mistook Les for Brad Grey at first.  They’re both perfecting that boyish look.  Wherein they can flash smiles like fourteen year olds to the press, but rant and rave to their inner circle.

And a few moments later Helen Hunt emerged from the mists.  People talk shit about her personal life, but she’s such a great actress.

And then that teen phenom who now syndicates his own talk show.  What’s his name again?  Byron Allen, that’s right, it comes back to me now.  He was bouncing a new baby on his chest.  He looked old, which is no crime, but my memory told me he was still young.

But the host of "Inside The Actors Studio", you know, the self-righteous interviewer who has now managed to become a star himself, he was so aged as to make one contemplate one’s own mortality.  We don’t live forever you know.

That’s what I’ve been contemplating for the past month or two.  It’s the end of the ski season.  But for the first time ever, I can foresee the fall, cold weather will come again, quite soon, in fact.  But I never perceived the seasons moving this fast.  Makes me realize that one only gets to see so many springs and so many falls.  And then there are none at all.

I contemplated all this as I emerged from the Beverly Hills Hotel.  It was positively hot.  The kind of heat that makes you want to go home and put on your shorts, maybe take a ride by the beach.  Suddenly, it’s summer.

And I’ve come to hate summer.  It’s too damn hot.  But it’s the price you pay for winter.  The only way to beat the system is to travel south of the equator every June.  But that’s gaming the system.

And after arriving home, changing into my aforementioned shorts, and catching up on some e-mail and the newspapers, I went into my bedroom and fired up my Kindle.  You see I’m hooked on a book.  "Olive Kitteridge".

I didn’t mean to read it.  I was looking for something else.

I wanted to purchase the Vanderbilt biography, especially now that they’d dropped the price to ten bucks, after the Kindle community outcry.  But that’s eight hundred pages in hardcover, and non-fiction.  I needed something to take me away.  Only fiction would do.  The stories may be made up, but when done right, they’re more truthful than any real life accounting.

So I’m surfing the Kindle store, looking at the best sellers.  It’s akin to the  music business.  Anybody who’s an educated reader wants nothing to do with these quickie, genre, made for a market tomes.  Of course there are exceptions, there are even great mysteries, but generally speaking, you don’t want what’s in the Top Forty and you don’t want what’s on the best seller list.  But I desired to read a book. And a flash occurred in my brain.  That woman who writes those nice stories, the ones about the slightly twisted families, what was her name, "Elizabeth Strout"?  Her new book had gotten such a great review.  I’ll download that, at least it will be easy to read.

So that’s how I ended up with a sample of "Olive Kitteridge" on my Kindle.  Which resembled the work of the author I was thinking of not a whit.  The story started off with too much description, a style faux pas to me.  But by time I figured out I had the wrong book, I was hooked. You see the writing had the ring of truth.  When the sample chapter ended, I immediately bought the rest.  I not only needed to know what happened, I didn’t want the warm fuzzy blanket of life lifted, I wanted to bask in the peculiar frailty, the ins and outs of the human race.

Turns out the book is one of linked short stories.  The only ongoing character is Olive Kitteridge herself.  And in some chapters her appearance is as fleeting as a Hitchcock cameo.  It’s tough to start over, after getting hooked on one person’s story, but each vignette has one line, one situation, which describes life perfectly, causing you to hit the Next Page button, continuing to read.

There’s the pharmacist, actually Olive’s husband, Henry, who hires a new girl whose spouse gets killed.  He keeps his distance, but comes to acknowledge to himself he’s in love with her.  And she reveals she feels the same way about him.  And this causes…silence.  You know how love with no future is.  Instead of coming together, you end up with something akin to hate.  You try to repel the person, it’s better than the unending yearning.  And this pushing away is not conscious, rather it’s instinctual.

Meanwhile, decades later, when Henry can finally stop fighting the feeling, and revel in it, when the girl lives thousands of miles away, he realizes his wife, Olive, was in love with a fellow teacher, and he runs to her and asks…YOU’RE NOT GOING TO LEAVE ME, ARE YOU? Marriage is complicated.  It’s got a life of its own.  It’s not all peaches and cream, sailing into the sunset.  But you’re together for a reason, and this reason keeps you staying together.

Then again, another character leaves his wife for someone who’s a wrong fit on paper.  Because his wife rejects physicality and this new woman…she wants to know him, what his favorite song is, the minor details that make you who you are that get pushed down inside, yet are yearning to get out.

Then there’s the training psychiatrist, about to commit suicide…  The only person he can trust is his psychiatrist.  Who warned him his girlfriend was crazy, that she’d leave him.  Yet this young man can’t relinquish the connection with his lost love.  But moments before he’s going to take his own life, he’s forced into rescuing an old classmate being carried away by the surf.  Funny how you want to end it, and then you fight so hard to keep going.

This isn’t the only suicide talk in the book.  Which takes place in a small coastal town in Maine.  As Joni Mitchell once sang, "we all live so close to that line, and so far from satisfaction".  It’s just that in public life, no one can acknowledge this.  The media wants winners.  Or complete losers.  But most people are just average.  Not that there’s anything wrong with that.  But who is delineating the hopes and dreams, the losses of everyman.  That’s great art.  When you can reflect ourselves back upon us.  That’s what Elizabeth Strout has done here.

In a world where business people are constantly trying to hoodwink us, with extensive marketing and constant barking to pay attention, it’s easy to get beaten down, to get frustrated.  Almost nothing lives up to the billing.  But when something does, you want to tell everybody about it.

Life is personal.  It’s just that no one wants to address your world.  The rappers want to talk about bitches and ho’s.  Mariah Carey wants us to know how fabulous her life is.  And Oprah Winfrey gives a commencement speech wherein she says how great it is to have a private jet.

Must be.  But most people don’t.  Most people are struggling.  With some victories interspersed.  You live, and then you die.  It’s a curious journey, that we’re dying to make sense of.  Yes, dying.  Every single day we’re closer to the end.  Are we using our time wisely?  Should we grab hold, take action, or is it just plain futile, and should we accept our fate.

I don’t know.

But I do know reading "Olive Kitteridge" I was not only taken to Maine, but to Vermont, to the location of so many important episodes in my own life.  What’s it like in the Mad River Valley today?  I can go to the cams, get pictures, but what’s it like to walk out the front door, breathe in the blooming flora and feel the sun upon your face?  Statistics are interesting.  Facts are important.  But emotions rule the world.

Live Nation No-Fee Wednesday

Great idea.

Except I wonder if people will be willing to pay full-price hereafter?

That’s the problem.  People will pay a fortune to be up close and personal at a superstar’s show, but once you go back from the stage…

Actually, I’ve heard that sales this year are kind of funny.  You can sell the high-priced tickets, and the ones in the back, but the ones in the middle aren’t moving.

And all those shows being heralded as sold out?  Even U2 tickets are available.

Business is bad.  The mainstream media has not caught on yet, but agents and promoters are singing the blues.  Seemingly every show in L.A. is offered through Goldstar, and this just has people waiting, for the discount tickets.

It’s time for a realignment.  No different than what’s happening in Detroit.  The concert business has to be rejiggered to comport with today’s economic reality.

Bottom line…  Superstars sell tickets.  Their ducats are a lot less price-sensitive.  I cannot see why fees are not buried into a final total price.  If the cost is exorbitant, what difference does it make if the $10+ fee is not broken out separately?  Do acts really think their fans are going to be pissed at them because tickets are not $137.50, but $150?  Those damn classic rockers, dinging me for $12.50, I liked it better when I blamed Ticketmaster…  Huh?

As for the less-desirable shows…

These fee-less Wednesdays are a start.  There’s no such thing as a cheap ticket anymore.  Because the fees often DOUBLE the price of the most affordable tickets.  So now we’ve got bargains.  But how many people are going to know?  The problem is concertgoing is no longer a regular ritual for most of the public, it’s something they do at most once a year, which they overpay for.  To get them to come consistently…they’ve got to be informed of the price and believe they’re not going to be ripped off.  It’s kind of like buying tires.  NO ONE believes the advertised price is the price on the car.  Eventually you need tires, but you don’t need to go to the show.  A final price can only help the concert industry.

But it’s not Live Nation’s fault.  And not Ticketmaster’s.  The acts are responsible.  They don’t want to look like they’re ripping off their fans.  They’d rather place the blame on the promoter and ticketing company.  As if they’re ultimately not all in it together…

Anyway, if you follow all the reports, cheap seats are not available solely for undesirable acts.  Lawn tickets will be sold for Blink-182, Coldplay, No Doubt, Nickelback, Toby Keith, the Killers, the Dead, Aerosmith, the Dave Matthews Band…HUNDREDS OF SHOWS!

What we’ve got here is a softening of desire.  Which must be addressed.  Live Nation is making a move.  I applaud this.

But when will the rest of the industry get off its pedestal and realize the customer is tapped out?  That he’s overpaid to see so many of these acts already. That the yearning is just not there.  That concert tickets are seen as a rip-off?

Sure, you can no longer make a fortune by selling recorded music, but that does not mean you can just jack up concert tickets.  If you lose your job you just can’t stop paying sales tax.  Everybody’s suffering.  Why should musical acts be immune?

As for entertainment being recession-proof…  That’s when entertainment was cheap.  When you can go to the concert for fifteen bucks, attendance will be through the roof.  But that’s what we need, people GOING!  However good American cars are now, after decades of being trumped by the Japanese, with consumers satisfied with their Asian purchases, it’s almost impossible to get the public to go American once again.  It’s heading this way in the concert business.  Years ago, you went to the show every month or so, sometimes even more frequently.  Now you overpay for a ticket almost a year in advance. Attending a concert is like going to a wedding, or going on vacation.  You’ll fit it into your schedule, but it’s a rare event.  Go to the show on a whim?

That’s what Live Nation is trying to do here.  Get an impulse buy.  Get people out to have a good time.  We’re not building new superstars.  As stated previously, it’s hard to live on recorded music revenue.  Unless the audience is enticed to come, to see the band, to buy merch and spread the word, it’s going to be hard to break an act.

Remember when you got to the show early, to see the opening band, to get turned on to something?

That’s the best place for an act to make its mark.  Live.  But you’ve got to be great and there have to be people in the building.

Everybody’s got to realign.  Acts can force managers to force agents to rip off promoters, but they CAN’T force people to go to the show.  How are we going to get people to come?  Price is a good start.  Experience is important once they’re through the gate.  And the show must be great.  Not a perfunctory, by the numbers rendition.

We’re starting over.

Ever since the days of the Fillmore it’s been believed that the tickets just go on sale and people come.  But that was when music drove the culture, when the acts were tied in with the fans as opposed to corporations, when the music MATTERED!  All those elements are going to have to return for the concert industry to be healthy once again.