{"id":34,"date":"2005-05-27T08:08:38","date_gmt":"2005-05-27T15:08:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/archives\/2005\/05\/27\/freakonomics\/"},"modified":"2005-05-27T08:29:07","modified_gmt":"2005-05-27T15:29:07","slug":"freakonomics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/2005\/05\/27\/freakonomics\/","title":{"rendered":"Freakonomics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So I&#8217;m sitting in the urologist&#8217;s office reading &quot;Freakonomics&quot; about <br \/>conventional wisdom.<\/p>\n<p>First the authors start off with the concept of asking questions.\u00c2\u00a0 It is said <br \/>those questions that have not been asked are not going to yield interesting <br \/>answers.\u00c2\u00a0 That all the GOOD questions have been pondered again and again.\u00c2\u00a0 The <br \/>goal is to ask a question that people REALLY care about and come up with <br \/>answers they don&#8217;t expect, if, that is, you can battle the conventional wisdom.<\/p>\n<p>Turns out the term &quot;conventional wisdom&quot; was coined by John Kenneth <br \/>Galbraith.\u00c2\u00a0 He said &quot;We associate truth with convenience, with what most closely <br \/>accords with self-interest and personal well-being or promises best to avoid awkward effort or unwelcome dislocation of life.&quot;\u00c2\u00a0 And where does the conventional <br \/>wisdom come from??\u00c2\u00a0 Self-declared experts.\u00c2\u00a0 Who are interested in burnishing <br \/>their reputations.\u00c2\u00a0 And journalists feed on the words of these experts, needing <br \/>to fill pages.<\/p>\n<p>But it turns out conventional wisdom is often wrong.\u00c2\u00a0 Hell, that&#8217;s almost the <br \/>ENTIRE point of &quot;Freakonomics&quot;.\u00c2\u00a0 Conventional wisdom said that crime <br \/>dissipated in New York because of Giuliani, who got rid of the squeegee men, who <br \/>cleaned up the subways, who took the streets back from the criminals.\u00c2\u00a0 Oh, a <br \/>million reasons have been posited about the crime decline.\u00c2\u00a0 But Steven Levitt has <br \/>the answer.\u00c2\u00a0 Proven with statistics, not pulled out of his ass.\u00c2\u00a0 It&#8217;s abortion.\u00c2\u00a0 <br \/>Legalized abortion.\u00c2\u00a0 It&#8217;s the unwanted children of single parents who commit <br \/>crime.\u00c2\u00a0 Not quite twenty years after abortion was legalized in New York, crime <br \/>dropped precipitously.\u00c2\u00a0 And this correlation can be proven because other <br \/>states legalized abortion LATER than New York, and their crime rates dropped too, <br \/>but only after the difference in time between the passage of abortion laws had <br \/>run.<\/p>\n<p>This got me to thinking.\u00c2\u00a0 What exactly is going on in the music business.\u00c2\u00a0 Is <br \/>the media, touting the words of so-called experts, putting forth conventional <br \/>wisdom that is just plain WRONG???<\/p>\n<p>Essentially everything being sold in record stores today is available for <br \/>free to those with computers.\u00c2\u00a0 Well, maybe you really need a high speed <br \/>connection to take advantage of free wares, but still, in excess of fifty percent of <br \/>the public has ready access to these fat pipes.\u00c2\u00a0 Shouldn&#8217;t the sale of CDs be <br \/>off FIFTY PERCENT??\u00c2\u00a0 Think about it.\u00c2\u00a0 No matter how low you drop the price of <br \/>CDs, no matter HOW many extras you offer, can you really compete with FREE?\u00c2\u00a0 <br \/>Think about it this way.\u00c2\u00a0 If a supermarket that charged was side by side with a <br \/>store that gave it away for free, would the pay supermarket stay in business?<\/p>\n<p>Now business in the pay market wouldn&#8217;t go down to zero.\u00c2\u00a0 Because one can <br \/>envision long lines to get free food.\u00c2\u00a0 There are always SOME people willing to <br \/>pay for convenience.\u00c2\u00a0 So, is this what is going on in the record business, are a <br \/>certain number of people paying for CONVENIENCE??\u00c2\u00a0 The lack of viruses, <br \/>artwork, improved sound quality?\u00c2\u00a0 We can debate this, but the more interesting <br \/>question is the one stated above, HOW COME CD BUSINESS HASN&#8217;T TANKED COMPLETELY??<\/p>\n<p>It hardly matters why people ARE buying CDs.\u00c2\u00a0 It certainly isn&#8217;t about the <br \/>extras, most CDs come sans extras.\u00c2\u00a0 If business is off less than twenty percent <br \/>in the last five years, could it be that downloading has NO IMPACT ON CD <br \/>SALES???<\/p>\n<p>Really, think about it.\u00c2\u00a0 For every person trotted out in the media who says <br \/>he&#8217;ll never buy a CD again, there are people trekking to the store, to BUY <br \/>discs.\u00c2\u00a0 Could it be that these people downloading were NEVER really buying CDs?\u00c2\u00a0 <br \/>And that really, it&#8217;s not an issue of a declining market, of eating away at CD <br \/>sales, rather this is an EXTRA MARKET THAT SHOULD BE TAPPED?<\/p>\n<p>Does suing people for trading files P2P really benefit the labels?\u00c2\u00a0 After a <br \/>brief bump, CD sales are off a few percentage points again.\u00c2\u00a0 There seems to be <br \/>no cause and effect.\u00c2\u00a0 If suits really worked, wouldn&#8217;t CD sales GO UP??\u00c2\u00a0 Never <br \/>mind that trading, contrary to what so-called experts have been saying is <br \/>actually WAY UP, isn&#8217;t the major labels&#8217; focus on the problem JUST PLAIN WRONG???<br \/>Shouldn&#8217;t they be worried about MONETIZING trading instead of eliminating it??<\/p>\n<p>Oh, don&#8217;t tell me about Snocap, don&#8217;t tell me about expiring trades, don&#8217;t <br \/>tell me about trades at ninety nine cents a track, that&#8217;s not what P2P IS!!\u00c2\u00a0 P2P <br \/>is a giant smorgasbord, where you can check out new stuff, even acquire stuff <br \/>YOU&#8217;RE NEVER GOING TO LISTEN TO!\u00c2\u00a0 It doesn&#8217;t resemble the conventional CD <br \/>model WHATSOEVER!\u00c2\u00a0 As a matter of fact, people DELETE a lot of what they acquire <br \/>through trading.\u00c2\u00a0 Most people don&#8217;t throw out CDs they paid fifteen plus bucks <br \/>for.<\/p>\n<p>Well, you can say that Yahoo Music Unlimited and Napster and Rhapsody are <br \/>equivalent to trading.\u00c2\u00a0 But you&#8217;d be wrong.\u00c2\u00a0 Because it misses a key element of <br \/>human reality, of the nature of P2P, people want to OWN!\u00c2\u00a0 Think about it, if <br \/>Yahoo Music Unlimited was SUCH a good deal, and it certainly is CHEAP, wouldn&#8217;t <br \/>MILLIONS of people have already signed up for it??\u00c2\u00a0 All the music you can eat <br \/>for fewer than ten dollars a month?\u00c2\u00a0 SOME people want this.\u00c2\u00a0 They want the <br \/>convenience, they want the security, but it turns out most people don&#8217;t.\u00c2\u00a0 And, <br \/>it&#8217;s not only about the price, P2P delivers music that is NOT AVAILABLE on the <br \/>so-called legitimate subscription sites.\u00c2\u00a0 There&#8217;s no plethora of live tracks, <br \/>no out of print items, no rarities, and these DRIVE P2P.\u00c2\u00a0 At least keep people <br \/>addicted.<\/p>\n<p>But what about the iTunes Music Store??<\/p>\n<p>Well, look at EMI&#8217;s just-released financials.\u00c2\u00a0 With all those iPods in <br \/>circulation, if the iTMS was so good, wouldn&#8217;t it represent TWENTY percent of EMI&#8217;s <br \/>revenues instead of the low single digits??<\/p>\n<p>The key is not to focus on enhancing the disc product.\u00c2\u00a0 This has no impact on <br \/>the people who ARE buying discs.\u00c2\u00a0 They&#8217;ve already made the decision to buy <br \/>CDs.\u00c2\u00a0 The bonuses are like&#8230;McDonald&#8217;s Value Meals.\u00c2\u00a0 More for your money.\u00c2\u00a0 But, <br \/>for those who don&#8217;t like Quarter Pounders, who don&#8217;t like McNuggets, who <br \/>don&#8217;t like Big Macs, IT MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE!\u00c2\u00a0 Furthermore, if these <br \/>extras were so enticing, wouldn&#8217;t business be going UP??<\/p>\n<p>At some point in the future, disc business will decline because of computer <br \/>music.\u00c2\u00a0 Almost everybody will have an iPod, almost everybody will have a high <br \/>speed connection, discs will seem antiquated, like vinyl.\u00c2\u00a0 Oops!\u00c2\u00a0 The labels, <br \/>RETAILERS killed vinyl to drive everybody to the more profitable CD.\u00c2\u00a0 Make no <br \/>mistake, if the INDUSTRY didn&#8217;t kill vinyl, CD acceptance would have been MUCH <br \/>slower.\u00c2\u00a0 No, that might not be true.\u00c2\u00a0 But, what WOULD be true is that vinyl <br \/>would have sold in quantity for MUCH LONGER!\u00c2\u00a0 Not everybody had a CD player at <br \/>first.\u00c2\u00a0 Some were driven to purchase them because of the extinction of the <br \/>vinyl configuration, but would they have done this if vinyl were still available?? <br \/>\u00c2\u00a0And, even today, vinyl is STILL being sold.\u00c2\u00a0 Which makes one wonder if as <br \/>long as companies still produce discs, there will be SOME market for them.\u00c2\u00a0 Then <br \/>again, once labels move on to selling files, which require no shipping, no <br \/>inventorying, fewer COSTS, won&#8217;t business principles tell them to stop <br \/>manufacturing discs, moving the rest of the market to FILES, just like they moved to <br \/>CDs??<\/p>\n<p>The file-trader is a different customer.\u00c2\u00a0 Acquiring and using music in a <br \/>different way.\u00c2\u00a0 The key is to monetize his behavior, not try to change it.\u00c2\u00a0 The <br \/>file-trader obviously doesn&#8217;t want CDs, and doesn&#8217;t want to rent music and <br \/>doesn&#8217;t want to buy AACs from the iTunes Music Store.\u00c2\u00a0 As stated above, he wants to graze and take a cornucopia of stuff, utilizing it completely differently <br \/>than conventional CD buyers.\u00c2\u00a0 Hell, look at their libraries.\u00c2\u00a0 Kids have THOUSAND <br \/>of MP3s.\u00c2\u00a0 Divide by ten, for there are usually ten tracks on an album, does a <br \/>vast quantity of kids have HUNDREDS of CDs??\u00c2\u00a0 I mean hard core music buyers <br \/>do, but the magic of P2P is it makes a VAST SWATH of the public music junkies.\u00c2\u00a0 <br \/>Isn&#8217;t this a GOOD THING?\u00c2\u00a0 Expanding the MARKET?<\/p>\n<p>The conventional wisdom is wrong.\u00c2\u00a0 If P2P is affecting CD sales, it&#8217;s <br \/>relatively marginal.\u00c2\u00a0 Lawsuits are not driving people into the stores to buy CDs, nor <br \/>are they driving people to so-called legitimate online music sites.\u00c2\u00a0 Rather, <br \/>P2P is a whole new marketplace, which, if shut down, will stunt the overall <br \/>music business for no good reason other than to fit the paradigm employed by <br \/>ancient record men afraid of change.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not about the Supreme Court.\u00c2\u00a0 And it&#8217;s not even about illegality.\u00c2\u00a0 It&#8217;s <br \/>about economics.\u00c2\u00a0 Wake up and smell the coffee. <\/p>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So I&#8217;m sitting in the urologist&#8217;s office reading &quot;Freakonomics&quot; about conventional wisdom. First the authors start off with the concept of asking questions.\u00c2\u00a0 It is said those questions that have not been asked are not going to yield interesting answers.\u00c2\u00a0 That all the GOOD questions have been pondered again and again.\u00c2\u00a0 The goal is to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-music-business","category-online"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p96vPs-y","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}