{"id":1103,"date":"2008-02-05T11:58:36","date_gmt":"2008-02-05T19:58:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/archives\/2008\/02\/05\/ownership\/"},"modified":"2008-02-05T11:58:36","modified_gmt":"2008-02-05T19:58:36","slug":"ownership","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/2008\/02\/05\/ownership\/","title":{"rendered":"Ownership"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We can argue over the mechanical rate, and lament that whatever it is, the major labels will negotiate it downward, but one thing&#8217;s for sure, in the future acts will own their records.<\/p>\n<p>The traditional deal was we find you, we pay you a bunch of money, and we own everything. Is this fair? Maybe if the record stiffs, but certainly not if it&#8217;s successful. The act pays for the album yet the label owns it? In what alternative universe does this make sense?<\/p>\n<p>In the world of major label accounting. Which is also undergoing a transformation. Because of transparency. If there&#8217;s no pressing, no manufacturing, and you just get a statement from your digital distributor, where do you perpetrate the fraud? That&#8217;s how labels make their money, via fraud. They sell a certain amount of product and pay you..? Which is why powerful lawyers and managers extract such huge advances, because they don&#8217;t trust the royalty system. But these big advances have brought EMI to its knees. For if the album is a failure, or doesn&#8217;t meet expectations, the money guaranteed is out of whack. EMI wants a more equitable deal. And part of this deal will involve the act owning its masters.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, that&#8217;s not the driving factor, the huge advances, but the transparency is key. Today recording contracts are no longer a mystery. Even fans, business experts after Napster, know that the act pays for the record yet doesn&#8217;t own it. Light has been shed on this heinous practice. And therefore, it won&#8217;t be able to exist.<\/p>\n<p>You write a book, you own it.<\/p>\n<p>Direct a movie and you don&#8217;t own it. Because the film is so damn expensive, there&#8217;s such a risk involved.<\/p>\n<p>Recording is no longer that expensive, it certainly doesn&#8217;t have to be. Sure, if you&#8217;re a superstar and want to spend a million dollars, be my guest. Then again, where are you going to sell all this product, in a world where no one goes diamond not because of piracy, but the inability to reach the masses combined with infinite choice?<\/p>\n<p>Recording costs are coming down. In many cases close to zero. Which in this case, is under 50k. Hell, let&#8217;s just say under 25k. And if you can&#8217;t lay your hands on 25k, you don&#8217;t deserve to be a successful artist. Go to your parents, go to your friends, your fan base, work on the road, your day job, if you can&#8217;t figure out a way to buy the computer equipment required to make a record, and pay for basic tracks in a big room, you don&#8217;t have the passion or desire to make it.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s what records are made on now, computers. And I don&#8217;t want to argue with engineers what is required for ultimate sound (interestingly, to be heard as MP3s via earbuds). It&#8217;s just that everybody is making records for less money. The label wants you to record vocals in a home studio. So, if costs keep going down, what is the rationale for the label to own the record?<\/p>\n<p>The rationale used to be that you couldn&#8217;t do it on your own, couldn&#8217;t make it on your own. You needed the label to be a bank. But now you can record on your own, and the label can&#8217;t do much for you. Can&#8217;t get you on television or on the radio. Why should you give up ownership? The business proposition just ain&#8217;t that good!<\/p>\n<p>Oh, if you&#8217;re the new Alicia Keys or Whitney Houston, a high concept act requiring money and time to expose and break you, the label is going to extract concessions, you can&#8217;t do it without them. But if you&#8217;re a band and your tracks are on MySpace (which Universal won&#8217;t allow), and you&#8217;re playing club gigs, why take almost no money and give up everything to an entity that just can&#8217;t do much for you? Other than take you to lunch and bill you for the privilege?<\/p>\n<p>360 deals? Where is it written that the labels will be all powerful in the future? I just don&#8217;t see it. They&#8217;re desperate. They want to recoup income. Who says acts have to give it to them? And each act is an individual entity, negotiating on its own. There&#8217;s no WGA forcing everybody to agree. You can&#8217;t keep acts in line.<\/p>\n<p>Which brings us back to mechanicals. If you own your own master, and you&#8217;re the label and you&#8217;re gaining all the revenue, who gives a shit what the mechanical rate is? Oh, if you get a cover you care, but do you write the kind of material that&#8217;s going to be covered? But what about your publisher, and his big advance? Well, do you need that publisher? And, once again, if you own the label&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>But publishers advance monies based on airplay, based on hits. Are there going to be hits in the future? Let&#8217;s put it this way, will it be a hit-driven business? Shit, the Eagles sold triple platinum, and the success of &quot;Long Road Out Of Eden&quot; had almost nothing to do with hits. There was airplay on one song. But, a brand name and visibility and a cheap price. The Eagles didn&#8217;t need the major label system.<\/p>\n<p>And neither did Radiohead.<\/p>\n<p>The new Radiohead wouldn&#8217;t break on MTV. Utterly impossible. So what does the new Radiohead need to make a heinous deal with a major label for? Look to the U.K., where majors license product, for a brief period of time, just to feed the pipeline&#8230; That&#8217;s more representative of the future than the all powerful label of the 1980s or 1990s.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not saying songwriters shouldn&#8217;t fight to get paid more. I&#8217;m just saying that the big label is no longer the bogeyman. The big labels are fighting ridiculous battles that don&#8217;t matter. If you&#8217;re a developing act you want your complete song on MySpace, and you want file-trading. If you&#8217;re not on the radio, how in the hell else are people going to discover you? You want to give now to get later. You don&#8217;t want people to have to pay a lot to get in on your scene, you want to develop.<\/p>\n<p>The desires of the acts and the major labels no longer square, they&#8217;re at odds. The label wants to pay little for an incredible upside, which it owns lock, stock and barrel. The acts used to have no choice. Now they do.<\/p>\n<p>Will there be labels in the future? Sure. But they won&#8217;t look like and won&#8217;t have the same names as the big four companies today. Because the new labels will be about building acts and maximizing revenue in all areas of exploitation. They&#8217;ll be about transparency. They&#8217;ll be run by geeks as opposed to mini-mafiosi. There will be a level of trust between performer and businessman. All things today&#8217;s majors abhor, which will contribute to their marginalization.<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t give up ownership of your records anymore. You don&#8217;t have to. Whether you license for a brief term or get the masters back at a certain sales level or both&#8230;this is now a negotiable point, just tell the labels you&#8217;re going to go indie&#8230; They&#8217;ll no longer laugh. They need you. They know indie can now deliver. They&#8217;ll negotiate.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We can argue over the mechanical rate, and lament that whatever it is, the major labels will negotiate it downward, but one thing&#8217;s for sure, in the future acts will own their records. The traditional deal was we find you, we pay you a bunch of money, and we own everything. Is this fair? Maybe [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-music-business"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p96vPs-hN","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1103"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1103\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lefsetz.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}