Facebook Is For Old People

Oldsters are about yesterday.

Youngsters are about today.

Documenting your entire life history, building a timeline, a shrine to yourself, so that the people you grew up with will be impressed? That’s for baby boomers. Their children want nothing to do with it. Kids are for living, oldsters are for dying.

Baby boomers didn’t start the texting revolution…

Want to communicate with your millennial in college? Then you’d better learn how to text, the younger generation barely e-mails. Talking on the phone? Who’d want to waste so much time!

The oldsters are rarely early adopters. They know the value of money, they’re set in their ways. For all the old bloviators bemoaning the loss of privacy online, it’s the kids who got the memo, that if they post pictures of illicit activity they might not get a job in the future. Kids believe in evanescence, oldsters believe in the permanent record. Ergo, the growth of Snapchat.

Kind of like the Facebook phone. The business media did not stop trumpeting its arrival. But the truth is a kid has no problem employing Facebook on his phone, assuming he wants to use it, it’s only oldsters who have this problem, oldsters who are not about to switch providers who are still lamenting the loss of physical keyboards. Want to know how someone’s technologically toast? If they still use a BlackBerry. You’re wiping out utilization, because it’s all about apps. E-mailing and texting back and forth is for business people who miss the future, as they plot where to have lunch.

There seems to be this belief that there’s stasis in the digital realm. As if Microsoft still ruled and tablets were not about to eclipse desktops. Sure, the digital highway is littered with the carcasses of failed enterprises, whether it be MySpace or Pets.com, but to think that iTunes is forever is to have missed the memo. The main asset of iTunes? The credit card numbers. Other than that?

As for Google… It’s been proven no one can eclipse the company in search, but is search, as we know it today, important tomorrow? Are we really gonna just type keywords into a blank field?

Interesting question.

The only company that seems to know what’s going on is Amazon. Which refuses to worry about profits and keeps plowing whatever money it makes into innovation, old style Microsoft innovation, not pure, incredible Apple innovation. Yup, the first iteration of Amazon products always sucks…but they keep on improving them. And they keep adding features to Prime and inventing new products.

What is the new product of Facebook?

Facebook didn’t come up with Tumblr or Pinterest, and certainly missed out on Twitter.

And isn’t it fascinating that the young ‘uns were the last to come to Twitter. The old techies and early adopters were there first. But their parents still don’t understand the need for Twitter, never mind how to use it.

We live in a fluid society. If your result comes up on the second page of Google, it might as well not exist…hell, if it’s not one of the first two or three hits, if not the very first.

Bury that information on Facebook, soon no one will see it.

But those who care are exchanging real time info constantly in the new world. That’s where it’s at.

And searching for profits, locked into an old paradigm, establishing contact between the distant, the lost, Facebook is missing the future.

Look at it this way… Kids already knew their friends, were already in constant contact with them. It’s baby boomers who needed to catch up on the lost souls.

I’m not saying Facebook is toast. I’m not saying no oldsters use Twitter.

But I am saying to look at the trends.

Microsoft owned desktop computing. They’ve even been reluctant to port their productivity apps to the iPad.

Is this a recipe for further success?

Tech is like bands, they’re rarely forever.

And if you want to know what a kid’s up to, going to their Facebook page will tell you very little. Hell, they’re leaving few digital crumbs for their parents… They’re devouring the cookies and leaving no trace!

9 Responses to Facebook Is For Old People


Trackbacks & Pingbacks »»

  1. Pingback by Signal/Noise | Pink Iguana | 2013/06/02 at 10:33:28

    […] specific and building credibility in the media. Signal == Truth seems like a reach. The subsequent Facebook blog piece, while plausible, shades a little to Fountain of Youth chasing, but that could be a function of the […]

  2. […] 虽然Facebook现在是全球最大的社交网络,但是这样的情况究竟能持续多久呢?近日,知名音乐行业分析师、前重要标签分析师Bob Lefsetz在自己的Lefsetz Letter中指出,Facebook已经无法满足年轻人的社交需求,他们正在寻找一个更加好的平台。 […]

  3. […] Bob Lefsetz, from a blog post entitled “Facebook is for Old […]

  4. […] Read the full blog post here. […]

  5. […] say Facebook is for old people. And who can argue against that? After all, kids these days are spending more time on Twitter and […]

  6. […] updates can range from musical critiques to observations about skiing to covering why Facebook is for Old People, but there are a handful of go-to formats I’ve […]

  7. […] Lefsetz wrote about it on his blog back in June. “Documenting your entire life history, building a timeline, a shrine to yourself, […]

  8. […] Facebook Is For Old People […]

  9. […] State of Change The record industry went first. Now we’re living through disruption in publishing, manufacturing, retail and marketing. Bob Lefsetz has cogent insights to share across all of these industries. He truly understands and can persuasively articulate the state of change. Take his recent letter, Facebook Is For Old People… […]

Comments are closed